PeaceQuest
  • Home
  • Projects
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Donate
  • Email Us: sstaples@peacequest.ca
  • For teachers: WarandChildren.com
  • Subscribe to our weekly newsletter
PeaceQuest
  • Home
  • Projects
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Welcome
  • Donate Now

    Scholarship fund studious poor children

    Notice: Test mode is enabled. While in test mode no live donations are processed.

    $
    Select Payment Method
    Personal Info

    Donation Total: $10

“Concrete action” needed for world without nuclear weapons: Jaramillo

Homepage Analysis “Concrete action” needed for world without nuclear weapons: Jaramillo
Analysis

“Concrete action” needed for world without nuclear weapons: Jaramillo

26 August 2020
By PeaceQuest
6 Comments
1491 Views

Three of four opposition parties in Canada’s Parliament support the UN Nuclear Ban Treaty, according to party statements obtained by the Hiroshima Nagasaki Day Coalition (PeaceQuest is a member). But in its statement through the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Liberal Party continues to ignore the new international treaty, officially called the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW).

Considering that the Liberals are a minority government, and need the support of at least one opposition party to continue to govern, how might this tri-party support for the Nuclear Ban Treaty impact the next Parliament, which will reconvene in late September?

I put these questions to one of Canada’s top experts on nuclear weapons, Cesar Jaramillo. Cesar is the Executive Director of Project Ploughshares, and he played a key role as a non-governmental representative when the negotiations for the treaty were completed successfully in 2017.

Cesar Jaramillo (top, middle) with Erin Hunt, Ray Acheson, Hiroshima survivor Setsuko Thurlow, and Allison Pytlak at UN Nuclear Ban Treaty talks, 2017.

Interview with Cesar Jaramillo, Project Ploughshares

Steve Staples, PeaceQuest: What is your reaction to the various party statements as a whole?

Cesar Jaramillo, Project Ploughshares: “Cross-party support for nuclear disarmament is certainly welcome, but it is far from sufficient. Declaratory statements must be translated into top policy priorities as well as persistent national and global advocacy for nuclear disarmament. Virtually every nuclear disarmament stakeholder in Canada and abroad welcomes the pursuit of a world without nuclear weapons—in principle. But this objective will only be achieved through concrete action that truly reflects the gravity of the nuclear weapons threat and the urgency of concrete steps toward abolition.”

Steve Staples, PeaceQuest: How might we move forward regarding the TPNW in Canada?

Cesar Jaramillo, Project Ploughshares: “The complete and irreversible elimination of nuclear weapons is not an eventual, ethereal objective, but an urgent and achievable one. Regrettably, while a growing majority in the international community has embraced the historic Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, Canada continues to embrace NATO’s overt nuclear deterrence policy as a legitimate security doctrine, effectively validating the weapons held by its nuclear-armed allies.”

What do you think?

Read the statements from the parties, and then write your comment and join the conversation.

Tags: Nuclear Ban Treaty

Previous Story
Opposition parties support UN Nuclear Ban Treaty
Next Story
New video chronicles the PeaceQuest story in Kingston

Related Articles

Where’s Canada? UN Nuclear Ban meeting in Vienna draws some NATO observers

Send your letter to PM Trudeau

A warning about Ukraine from Japan A-bomb survivor

Sweden and Finland must consider the cost of joining nuclear...

6 replies added

  1. Steven Staples 26 August 2020

    As more countries sign and join the treaty, Canada and other “middle powers” look increasingly out-of-step. Canada has taken positions independent of the US before (Vietnam, landmines, Iraq, missile defence, to name a few), and we can do so again.

  2. Ted Reynolds 26 August 2020

    My first active protest against nuclear weapons was over 60 years ago. Although I am an American, I have never since changed my mind. Go for it.

  3. Carol Pickup 26 August 2020

    Bravo NDP, The Green Party and the Bloc -very disappointed in the Liberal and Conservative parties!!

  4. Vic Neufeld 26 August 2020

    I too am disappointed in the Liberal and Conservative Party’s stance.

  5. Gerhard Neufeld 26 August 2020

    Who are the real stakeholders to keep the status quo? They need to be identified and “worked on” – they will make the politicians change their mind.

  6. Gerhard Neufeld 27 August 2020

    Who are the real stakeholders that want to maintain the status quo? They should be identified and “worked on” and they will make the politicians change their mind.

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Action
  • Analysis
  • Commentary
  • Event
  • PeaceQuest Cape Breton
  • PeaceQuest Kingston
  • PeaceQuest Regina
  • Resource
  • Teachers

Contact

PeaceQuest Leadership and Education Initiative

c/o Steven Staples, Chairperson

225 Sumach Street W303

Toronto  ON M5A 0P8

Email: sstaples@peacequest.ca

Phone: m. 647-327-7187

PeaceQuest Info

  • Projects
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Donate
  • Subscribe

Local Groups

  • Cape Breton
  • Kingston
  • Regina

 

 

Teachers

  • WarandChildren.com
Copyright ©2020 PeaceQuest Leadership and Education Initiative
SearchPostsLogin
Thursday, 30, Jun
How the military’s media machine targets its enemies
Wednesday, 29, Jun
Ukraine war can be blamed on U.S. neoconservative thinkers: Sachs
Tuesday, 28, Jun
Why so many Canadians support the “Truckers”
Friday, 24, Jun
Nuclear whistle-blower says Ukraine war testing willingness of nuclear-nations to lose
Thursday, 23, Jun
Where’s Canada? UN Nuclear Ban meeting in Vienna draws some NATO observers
Tuesday, 21, Jun
A warning about Ukraine from Japan A-bomb survivor

Welcome back,