I checked the 'real threat's economic, not war.' We are in that economic war, right now. However if I could have chosen 'remote but worth planning for' as well - both are worth planning for!
You're welcome! Since the reaction in question confirms that Canada--in spite of the hopeful rhetoric of our Prime Minister's speech at Davos--is still trapped in the logic of violence and counter-violence embraced by the hegemons, I wonder if you see any opening in our day for a meaningful discussion of nonviolent resistance/unarmed civilian defense as a more effective response to a U.S. invasion.
I checked the 'real threat's economic, not war.' We are in that economic war, right now. However if I could have chosen 'remote but worth planning for' as well - both are worth planning for!
Is Option 4 describing U.S. aggression or Canadian reaction?
Canadian. I updated for extra clarity. Thanks.
You're welcome! Since the reaction in question confirms that Canada--in spite of the hopeful rhetoric of our Prime Minister's speech at Davos--is still trapped in the logic of violence and counter-violence embraced by the hegemons, I wonder if you see any opening in our day for a meaningful discussion of nonviolent resistance/unarmed civilian defense as a more effective response to a U.S. invasion.