PeaceQuest
  • Home
  • Projects
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Donate
  • Email Us: sstaples@peacequest.ca
  • For teachers: WarandChildren.com
  • Subscribe to our weekly newsletter
PeaceQuest
  • Home
  • Projects
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Welcome
  • Donate Now

    Scholarship fund studious poor children

    Notice: Test mode is enabled. While in test mode no live donations are processed.

    $
    Select Payment Method
    Personal Info

    Donation Total: $10

Storm brewing in Sweden over NATO’s nuclear weapons

Homepage Commentary Storm brewing in Sweden over NATO's nuclear weapons
Commentary

Storm brewing in Sweden over NATO’s nuclear weapons

29 July 2022
By Steven Staples
0 Comment
2714 Views

Last week we let you know about a proposal by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate and former President of Costa Rica, Oscar Arias, for NATO to trade its American-owned nuclear weapons in Europe for a peace deal in Ukraine with Russia.

The United States has special agreements with five NATO countries to base nuclear weapons on their soil: Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, and Turkey.

Now, with Sweden (and Finland) ready to join the alliance, questions are being asked: How will NATO membership impact Sweden’s traditional disarmament position? Is Sweden prepared to accept U.S. nuclear weapons on its soil, too?

Writing in the magazine that publishes the world-famous “Doomsday Clock” on its cover, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Jens Petersson says that, with Sweden and Finland on a fast track to become members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the consequences for Sweden’s traditional stance on disarmament issues are now becoming more obvious.

“Many voices asked for a debate on these issues before Sweden applied for membership, but it is not until now that signs of such public discussion have been broadly seen. Sweden’s new alignment raises several questions also on the international level,“ he writes.

“In a letter of intent dated July 5, 2022, Sweden’s Foreign Minister Ann Linde wrote to NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg that ‘Sweden accepts NATO’s approach to security and defense, including the essential role of nuclear weapons, intends to participate fully in NATO’s military structure and collective defence planning processes and is willing to commit forces and capabilities for the full range of Alliance missions.’”

Swedish disarmament proponents have harshly criticized this new step. Swedish-born Beatrice Fihn, who leads the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) and accepted the Nobel Peace Prize alongside Canadian Setsuko Thurlow in 2017, signed a statement that said, “Sweden is … willing to offer capacity to the ‘full range of the alliance missions.’ This includes use of nuclear weapons, which would be a violation of international law.” It continued: “In addition, Sweden is opening up to accept and receive nuclear weapons on Swedish territory. We cannot interpret it in any other way.”

Jens Petersson fears that NATO membership will shift Sweden’s support for disarmament toward NATO’s view that nuclear weapons are essential.

“After eventually becoming a NATO member, Sweden will likely continue viewing nuclear disarmament as something desirable. From time to time, Sweden will join hands with other moderate NATO members on arms control and disarmament issues. In general Sweden is, however, known to be loyal to organizations it joins, and for this reason Sweden will be less likely to initiate more independent initiatives in the future, in my view,” he concludes.

  • Read “As Sweden gets ready for NATO, will its approach to nuclear weapons change?” by Jens Petersson, published on July 27, 2022 in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

(Cover:: MALMSLÄTT, SWEDEN- 5 MAY 2018: Soldiers in the Swedish Armed Forces. Photo Jeppe Gustafsson via Shutterstick)

Tags: NATO

Previous Story
Updated! Hiroshima and Nagasaki Day events in Canada 2022
Next Story
Give Peace No Chance?

Related Articles

Why a No-Fly Zone won’t work

Here are some tough questions for anyone who wants a...

Will U.S. troops be fighting in Ukraine?

There are four reasons why the answer is "no"

Categories

  • Action
  • Analysis
  • Commentary
  • Event
  • PeaceQuest Cape Breton
  • PeaceQuest Kingston
  • PeaceQuest Regina
  • Resource
  • Teachers

Contact

PeaceQuest Leadership and Education Initiative

c/o Steven Staples, Chairperson

225 Sumach Street W303

Toronto  ON M5A 0P8

Email: sstaples@peacequest.ca

Phone: m. 647-327-7187

PeaceQuest Info

  • Projects
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Donate
  • Subscribe

Local Groups

  • Cape Breton
  • Kingston
  • Regina

 

 

Teachers

  • WarandChildren.com
Copyright ©2020 PeaceQuest Leadership and Education Initiative
SearchPostsLogin
Friday, 3, Feb
Stars and stinkers: How the media covers the F-35
Wednesday, 1, Feb
Both sides using banned landmines and bombs in Ukraine war
Sunday, 29, Jan
How to reach a just and lasting peace in Ukraine: Sachs and the IPB
Friday, 27, Jan
Could Canada and NATO tanks risk escalating the war in Ukraine?
Wednesday, 25, Jan
With the F-35 buy, has Canada has given up on peace-building?
Tuesday, 24, Jan
Webinar: Myths, Realities, and Implications of China’s Nuclear Buildup

Welcome back,